One of the most overwhelming feelings that I used to experience when sitting through the classes that compromised my Masters in Environmental Technology was that of hopelessness. The statistics were just too depressing, the levels of pollution, poverty, extinctions, CO2 increases and the policy inadequacies and political idiocies that were making change a slow painful process when any progress is made that is. The naïve ideas that I grew up with reading Gerald Durrell that conservation and protecting the environment was all about breeding species, fencing off protected habitats were quickly lost. The reality is environmental protection is as much about people as it is about animals and plants.
This was really brought home to me during a couple of research stints in Agrapatana and in Moneragala, where the forest ‘reserves’ are ridiculously disturbed. The thing is you can’t really stop it, how do you tell a villager that she cannot use wood from the forest to boil water for her child? And for what, an obscure concept of biodiversity dear to people who already have all they need to survive and more. The only way to really protect the environment is lift people out of poverty, give them alternatives to chopping firewood, lives that are more than just about survival. Entrepreneurs, both the regular kind and social ones have as much to do in the battle for saving the life systems that support us as do conservation biologists.
But this is where I lose hope. I’ve worked for a non-profit in the US but was a bit disturbed by the general attitude I found, a lack of understanding in the ground realities in the developing world. The people were admirable but showed hostility towards things such as outsourcing that I found hard to stomach as for me, activities like outsourcing are about giving people chances. A way up in the world letting poverty go, a way for countries to get less reliant on their natural resources. Of course raising people out of poverty is a double-edged sword, the more affluent they become the more they consume, the more pressure they put on the ‘system’ so to speak. Whether a balance will be found and more sustainable ways to provide for the billions who live on the bottom of the pyramid is an answer that will probably only be evident in hindsight.
Another reason that I lose hope is the lack of inclusiveness in the environmental movement. Everywhere I look there is a lack of cooperation, a lack of understanding of an alternate view. It’s the developers vs. the hikers, NGO’s vs. governments, governments vs. the common people, etc, etc. As usual everyone is looking out for their own interests and the messages get lost in the confusion. Of course there are exceptions, but they’re frightfully rare.
Where do I see my part in all this? I started out as a kid wanting to save species at all costs, heal the environment and all that good stuff. I have lost hope in that in my opinion the battle is already lost. We will lose a lot of species in the coming decades, maybe even suffer an environmental catastrophe, one that is probably necessary before humanity will change the way it conducts its business that will cause a lot of people to lose their lives. Whether humanity will survive or go the way of the Mayans is to me a dicey question. I know I sound pessimistic, but it’s better to face the truth than bury your head in the sand. For one thing just because the fight is lost doesn’t mean there is nothing left to save.
I for one want to keep fighting.

I couldn’t agree more…alleviating poverty is a huge part of ensuring our prolonged existence, but it’s almost as important to encourage the ‘developed’ world to act more like ‘world’ citizens and less like frogs in a well. Unfortunately, this part of the world seems all too willing to just pass the buck to everyone’s favourite villains (China and India) and adopt a “well if they’re not doing anything about it, why should we?” attitude.
For the record, I lost hope during my Sustainability course as well. Sadly though, some of my course mates felt that since we’re all gonna die anyway, we might as well party on. Sigh.
Comment by PseudoRandom — October 15, 2007 @ 7:49 am
Hey N - I do see where you’re coming from and agree that this is such a monumental problem on the global scale that it is unlikely things will get much better before they get much worse. Here in Sri Lanka, however, there are so many small steps that can be taken by a more perceptive administration with regard to proper land management, using simple soil and water conservation techniques that, if implemented on a micro scale will make huge differences on the ecological front. However, as we all know, priorities by the tunnel-visioned and selfish entities in charge are more in keeping with their personal agendas and not ‘for the greater good’. Us folk, however, will do what we can on our miniscule scale and this will sustain our ecologically sound micro-environments – and hope for the best, I guess.
Comment by Java Jones — October 15, 2007 @ 9:42 am
More than anything Id say it all just boils down to one thing. People just aren’t freaking bothered I have yet to see anyone,(volunteer, official, paid, unpaid etc.. ANYONE) who genuinely cares about the environmental status of this planet just for the sake of the environmental status of the planet. Humans jut arent bothered as long as they can get on with whatever they do in the immediate present
& I think thats what really sucks. if you cared about it you’d find some way to do something about it. Most just dont.
Comment by Dili — October 15, 2007 @ 12:51 pm
I feel exactly the same, but on the opposite side.
I want to see development in this country, but when ever I do speak about it I’m marked as a advocate of the devil, send here to destroy the whole planet as well as all living things.
Yeah, and the real message gets lost in confusion.
Comment by R — October 15, 2007 @ 4:21 pm
Count me in. There’s some Left worth fighting for. !! Very True some ppl don’t spot-on knw the ground reality. Hope we ourselves an bridge that divide.
Comment by dogfight — October 21, 2007 @ 6:12 pm
Read this post some time back and been thinking about it.
I only know that in Oz ordinary people are acutely aware and panicking about the effect of climate change and it is clearly an election issue. Inflation is high, due to the fuel crisis as well as the drought. Governments have been dealing with it pragmatically and encourage environmentally safe practices by providing householders subsidies for purchase of energy efficient household appliances (fridges, washing machines etc.),low pressure showerheads, water saving garden irrigation systems, and even garden mulch. There are also regulations that new houses must comply with what is called five star energy ratings. The education system has also been playing an important role and I see younger kids pulling up parents for not recycling!
In a “third-world” context I was wondering if this pragmatic approach of incentives and subsidies has been used?
Also from what I have read, countries such as the US are one of the largest consumers of the earth’s depleting resources, so these countries should probably targeted first. I can’t see why what you have learnt can’t be applied in this context?
Comment by L — November 4, 2007 @ 11:46 am