Waaaaaaa…..
Hmm…so Australia beat us. And somehow the world seems to think that we have brought the game into disrepute. Yeah sure we don’t go around calling people ‘black cunts’ or moan like babies at any given opportunity but somehow resting our key bowlers is a controversy. Let’s look at the facts shall we? How old are Murali and Vaas, they are veterans both in their late thirties. Murali was hobbling a bit in the game against England, why risk both of them in what is in the end a pointless match? It may have been important to the Aussies, as we were probably the first decent team apart from maybe the Saffers they have played in the tournament so far. I think Mahela’s move to rest the bowling attack was a good one; we really had nothing to lose. If we won, hell we won with a half arsed attack, if we lost….well we lost because of a half arsed attack.
Of course that our batting messed up is an issue and a glaring one. What gives me some comfort is the intelligent game that Chamara and Mahela played. From cricinfo it seemed very much an Aravinda/Arjuna type innings. Anyone remember those? When they came into the middle after the top order had fallen and just chipped away, almost nonchalantly building a respectable total or chasing one down. They were so clinical I remember falling asleep at Khetta, they were so effective at chasing down targets. For me to sleep at a cricket match is one thing, but to fall asleep when 16 and accompanied by hot 19 year old Vishakhians was an achievement by itself…amuses me now that I used to think of R and H akki in those terms…hormones! Anyways digression about hot Vishakhians aside (as rare as they are) we really need Mahela, Chamara and Kumar to start playing that ‘brand’ of cricket. Let Sanath go for the big hits, but his success/failure shouldn’t dictate the score.
At the end of the day it was a bit of a mind game and a bit of conservatism, Australia may be crying as usual but then that’s to be expected. They always whinge, just read the tone of this article in response to some comments by Ranatunge. Of course they have no hesitation with playing their own mind games. Apparently Justin Langer has a direct connection to Tom Moody’s brain despite reports to the contrary. Of course this wasn’t mind games at all. I personally detest the Australian cricket team, they are to cricket what the USA is to the Olympics, the end result of a little talent and a lot of money. Countries like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh have always been more ‘naturally’ talented but with the lack of discipline brought about by the intense training approaches that money can buy the Australians will always lack consistency, until at least they are extremely experienced. Their tendency to whine about the slightest thing that makes other teams better is also annoying, they of course can go ahead and bowl underarm if they see fit. The greatest reason I despise them is of course what they tried to do to Murali and the continued treatment he receives there. Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to see our boys beat the Aussies, I hope when/if we play them in the final each and every one will be thinking “Remember Murali!”

dunno if we hid the cards or genuinely rested them 4 must win Ireland match. guess we need the heat of the final to dish out the goods. It was nice 2 see our boys scamper a single fooling the Mighty Ricky!! yeehoo !!
Comment by dogfight — April 17, 2007 @ 5:52 am
Great post man… I tend to agree with you on most of it… Lets just hope our guys can get through the semi’s…
Comment by Dark_Horse — April 17, 2007 @ 6:25 am
The only worry about this machan, is not the fact that we lost a completely inconsequential game…but the fact that we seem to have taken the semi final for granted. We cannot afford to do that. AT all!
Comment by Sophist — April 17, 2007 @ 7:39 am
The object of the World Cup 2007 is to play the game. No doubt winning is crucial for all the teams. However, whatever strategic decisions are made in the process of getting to the top one must never sacrifice the game and its players in reaching it.
The absence of MM, CW, and Malinga Ihe was supposed to be still recovering from his ankle injury and hence may be excused), killed the game completely, for the participants, spectators on the ground all those Millions watching on TV across the globe. How wonderful it would have been to watch them decimating the Kangaroo’s when they batted second on a slowing wicket?
It is sad that the people behind the scenes extend their tactical strategy to affect the object of the game in itself.
At the end of the day, whatever people may say about winning or losing, its the playing of the game that matters. That is what we were taught when we we played the game in the sixties.
Comment by kadalay — April 17, 2007 @ 7:58 am
It seems as though treating a game against Australia as a dead-rubber match (which it was) is considered ‘bringing the game into disrepute’. How dare you laugh at the gods of cricket?!?! LOL I’m loving it. What a slap in the face to the Aussies…they hype up this match to no end and then we play our water/towel boys.
I think it was more a case of hiding our best cards than resting ageing maestros. And because we know that the Kangas are too arrogant to rest their key bowlers, our batsmen got good batting practice against the likes of Bracken and McGrath. Yes we failed miserably (except for Mahela and Chamara, who were playing solidly), but I’d rather we fail now than on the 28th. Methinks this is more Tom Moody’s doing than Mahela’s, which makes it so much sweeter!
Sophist, you say we’ve taken the semis for granted. Not so. During the presentation ceremony, Mahela said that we need to up our game for Ireland…anyone would think that game has a foregone conclusion. On the other hand, Ponting said they’re in good touch for the final…so who’s taking the semis for granted now, eh?
Fact of the matter remains that this was a completely redundant match, and we did well to deny Australia the opportunity to meet their #1 opponents. EVEN if we don’t meet them in the final, resting our bowlers y’day will remain an insult to the Aussies. Anyone who saw the Sky Sports presentation will remember how pissed off Michael Slater was, and one listen to Ian Chappell’s rant on cricinfo will confirm the same. Way to go Lanka!
Comment by PseudoRandom — April 17, 2007 @ 10:10 am
I agree that some of these guys are over-reacting for no reason. Moody and Jayawardene had their tactical reasoning for excluding the three bowlers today and it may pay dividends should SL qualify for the finals. If they don’t, no harm done.
“I personally detest the Australian cricket team, they are to cricket what the USA is to the Olympics, the end result of a little talent and a lot of money. Countries ”
Perhaps your hate is making you delusional as well. India has three times the money that Australia does. Why don’t they show some consistency then? Fucking England has more money than the Aussies which is why a majority of them rush to County cricket during their off periods.
And Australia lack talent? That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.
Show me a batsman in contemprary cricket who is as solid, as dangerous and as consistent as Ricky Ponting. Show me a leader who is as exemplary as he is. Show me a side who has more players on teh wrong side of 30 and still beating the living fuck out of the rest of the world. Show me a domestic cricket structure that is as competative, that is as Darwinian as the Australian State Shield tournament.
Show me.
Comment by Theena — April 17, 2007 @ 11:22 am
You might have heard that Glenn McGrath was living in a caravan before he was selected for Australia. This is still true of most of the current butch of Sheffield Shield cricketers.
And you tell us that they have money and no talent? Right.
Comment by Theena — April 17, 2007 @ 11:26 am
Dogfigt – would have been nicer if the buggers had batted decently
Dark-horse – yeah, hope they sort the batting for that contest
Sophist- bit unclear here, are u saying we took winning the semis for granted or getting to the semis? I was under the impression the latter was for sure…not so sure they are taking winning the semi for granted…would be better for them not to have to face aussie in the semis
Kadalay – with all due respect, the way the game is played now is a lot different from the sixties. With a format like the super eights it makes sense to play each game with a strategy in mind, also with the hectic schedules wear and tear is a problem so playing every game 100% probably doesn’t make sense
Pseudo – yeah the double standards as usual, Aussies do it its tactical, we do it its almost ‘cheating’ btw…suprising lack of stick from you on my Vishakhian comment
Theena – whoa there, don’t get your panties in a bunch mate. First off Glenn being trailer trash has nothing to do with what I said. I’m not talking about individual wealth but about the money spent on infrastructure, training, etc. India really has three times the money? Ok, but they have about a hundred times the population. Per capita however that money means much, much less and per capita investment in sports is what counts. Also india’s money is recent, Australia has been pumping money into their infrastructure for decades. Talking about money in sports is not one dimensional and certainly has nothing to do with how much money each player has.
I didn’t say they lack talent but they don’t have as many players who are ‘naturally’ talented. It’s a subtle distinction and definitely a grey area but what wins Australia matches is consistency and that has less to do with talent but a lot to do with discipline, systems and infrastructure in place. Personally not sure why the English are so crap, may have something to do with fact that cricket is such a fringe sport there (trust me I was there in the ’99 world cup, nobody really cared)…they’re also pretty shit at most sports for some reason…so dunno what that’s about.
With the Australians in County cricket, it makes sense for Australians to make some pounds, I know a lot of Australians who work in England for a few years just because the pound is stronger…but relatively speaking compare how much money is invested in football vs. cricket in England, again per capita is important.
As for Ponting being exemplary as a leader, perhaps you’re not too sure about what makes a good leader. One quality is integrity…Ponting might need to look that one up in the dictionary.
I said LITTLE talent, not NO talent. That was probably a mistake, it should be mediocre amounts of talent with the exception of players like Symonds and Hussey (who from what I’ve seen are ‘naturally’ talented. Lastly I didn’t ‘tell ‘ you anything, I gave my opinion.
Comment by childof25 — April 18, 2007 @ 2:11 am
Totally agree on the per capita investment issue…to my knowledge Australian cricket has possibly the best infrastructure in the world, whether it be in training or physiotherapy. And what’s the bet during his trailer trash days, McGrath still had more money than the average Bangladeshi cricketer (for instance) has now? And isn’t the fact that he’s now rolling in it testament to the fact that Australian cricket is loaded?
I personally think Ponting is one of Australia’s lesser captains, but he’s been blessed with one heck of a consistently amazing side. I don’t see an opponent-specific game plan though - Hayden just drives the opposing bowlers to suicide and Bracken/McGrath finish off what’s left (and vice versa).
As for the English side…I don’t think they have the capacity to be consistent - KP is the only one who seems to go into every game thinking “I’m going to get a century”. I think Saj has it, but he’s too wayward at times. Everyone else is “oh we’ll see how it goes”.
Oh and N, haven’t you ever heard of the saying “dogs bark, caravan passes”?
Comment by PseudoRandom — April 18, 2007 @ 12:15 pm
Pseudo - aww…ur no fun!:D
Comment by childof25 — April 18, 2007 @ 1:29 pm
I have to admit that I agree with you about the Aus. cricket team. Their attitudes are still stuck in 1950s white australia, while the rest of the country has moved on. Even in Australia, you will find people are less likely to support their own team, while being much more enthusiastic in supporting the Australian Olympic athletes or our soccer team.
Also find them boring to watch. I might be wrong…but I think even in the 1980s and 1990s, they had alot of money, but still…the Brits, Indians, Pakistanis and the West Indians with inferior sporting infrastructure…but superior talent, used to thrash them. At the moment more than the lack of money the corruption with betting scandels etc. is eating through the game. The Sri Lankans added a fresh face to the game and now the Bangledeshis are doing this. Hope these two teams will keep improving and not go the way of the Indians and Pakistanis.
I am also concerned that the Sri Lankans are tending to look towards the Australians as an example of a sucessful team. I hope we don’t end up with another boring team (esp. with an australian coach) that is only interested in unethical mindgames at the cost of entertaining us with a good game of cricket.
In Australia, when Tendulkar comes to the crease….everyone cheers. We all venerate him. I have seen the whole MCG, cheering him on…hoping we get value for money…and he doesn’t get out for a duck! I am there to be entertained by the worlds best players…not simply to see my country win.
Comment by aussie — April 18, 2007 @ 4:24 pm
By the way, I think slowly but surely, the attitudes are changing in the Australian team with players like Gilchrist and some of the younger players.
Comment by aussie — April 18, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
Well, admittedly, Malinga’s only faced the Aussies in one ODI in his entire career. And now the Aussies are afraid, so much so that they wanted to prove something. The fact that they didn’t, or that the world didn’t get to see this absolutely fabulous exhibition match, is a case of true disgrace for the game, right?
For those of you out there who missed the point, the Sri Lankans love to put on a good show as much as the next top-tier team, but guess what? They also like to WIN. And if a shot at winning is something they believe they can accomplish by benching their three best bowlers and letting them heal in preparation for the shot at the final, I say bravo. And guess what else… We’re all going to get to see this same match-up played out at full force AGAIN!
Or have we lost hopes against eliciting another win out of our match-up with New Zealand too?
Comment by Damean — April 19, 2007 @ 6:42 pm