Hair today, please be gone tomorrow
Well I’ll be a monkey’s uncle, I remember reading this article with a sense of disbelief and incredulity. Surely the big man jests, blithely stating ‘Yes, I am down to umpire in the Champions Trophy and I expect to fulfill that appointment.’ Imagine the arrogance in thinking one can get away with accusing teams without basis (in my humble opinion) of breaking the rules, acting outside of cricketing law and effectively blackmailing the ICC. The Aussie apologists of course are backing big Darrell all the way, ‘If he’s one of the best umpires in international cricket then of course he should be umpiring..’ so says that paragon of fair play Ponting. That’s a big fucking IF there old boy.
Imagine if Assad Rauf or Aleem Dar did something similar to this, accusing say the English team of tampering to produce a ‘swinging’ victory in the Ashes, changing balls in the middle of a game that Australia was winning and trying to extort money in response for silence from the ICC. I’ll bet you my right ball that pretty much the whole of Australia’s and England’s cricketing fraternity would be baying for their blood, for them to be hung, drawn, quartered and then forced to watch Warne’s whale sex action tape (google it if you don’t know what I’m on about) as punishment. Any umpire from the Asian subcontinent if they did anything similar would probably be roundly reamed by the Aussies and would not be able to play even one bump cricket on the street.
I’m glad the Indian board has woken up and told Hair to bugger off and hopefully this will sound the death knell for his career. Given Hair’s history and blatant lying that he follows all the rules of cricket (ergo his inability to accept the ruling that Murali doesn’t throw), he is the one that should have the book thrown at him (preferably all the Brittanica volumes if I had my way) and charged with bringing the game into disrepute. I hope Hair gets buggered off the panel and not allowed to umpire anymore while the Pakistanis get absolved of tampering, Ranjan over to you….

Good one bra. Think Pointing just got a blow by Hair.
Comment by Horus — September 27, 2006 @ 9:38 am
gotta hand it to Hair - he’s got balls
Comment by savi3 — September 27, 2006 @ 1:06 pm
Im rather curious about that whale tape..sounds disturbing
Comment by venus — September 27, 2006 @ 1:53 pm
Hats off to India for flatly refusing him. Hopefully it would supported by Sl,Pak,Bang,Zim and SA!
Serves right for the bugger!
Comment by Niroshan — September 27, 2006 @ 3:41 pm
he sure seem 2 hav a knak 4 controvesy. he’d better not come close 2 the sub continent or else he can take home a load of rotten tomatoes and egg shells. Let Ranjan do the needful wut eva ‘da hell it is.
Comment by dogfight — September 28, 2006 @ 3:16 am
Horus - it seems all the Aussie cricketers and umps fraternize a bit much
savi3 - someone should hit them for six
Venus - tis very, very disturbing…well the models are hot but Warnies in his scivvies is not a good site
Niroshan - Asian bloc should step on his neck and press hard
dogfight - actually Ranjan is in charge of the Inzi hearing..which if/when he gets acquited should mean the end of Hair’s career
Comment by N — September 28, 2006 @ 3:45 am
Well Ranjan’s done what I personally hoped he’d do - Inzi’s cleared of ball tampering but guilty of bringing the game into disrepute. IF ONLY he had brought the players onto the field and THEN refused to play!
Hopefully Hair’s days are numbered.
Comment by PseudoRandom — September 28, 2006 @ 2:41 pm
bit harsh innit banning Inz from playing in 4 games as a punishment for forfeiting the test? Hair on the other hand was all smiles on the telly.. he’s got one BIG ego has he not?
Comment by savi3 — September 28, 2006 @ 10:28 pm
Well I think the 4 game ban is the minimum he could’ve given. As for Hair’s attitude…is it just me or do most cricketing Australians have the same attitude?
Comment by PseudoRandom — September 29, 2006 @ 11:39 am